Charles Kenny

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Profile
  • Subscribe

About

Categories

  • A. Upside of Down
  • B. Getting Better
  • C. Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Utility
  • D. Overselling the Web?
  • E. Economic Development
  • F. Globalization
  • G. Corruption and Transparency
  • H. Global Health
  • I. Happiness
  • J. Internet and ICTs
  • K. Gender
  • L. Education
  • M. National Security
  • N. Inequality
  • O. Environment
  • P. Other Topics
  • Q. Academic writing
  • R. Columns and general writing
  • S. Speaking
See More
Subscribe to this blog's feed

Black boys are the least likely of any group to escape poverty

On the grim economic prospects for black males in the US, for The Economist.

How Republicans embraced identity politics

The party of white people can't accuse Democrats of being all about identity politics.  For the Economist.

The gender equality toolbox: The areas of society that still need work, and how to do it

A piece on what Canada could do to further global gender equality for OpenCanada.org.

 

Poverty in America: welfare programmes are not the problem

Welfare works.  Me in The Economist.

Black Americans are over-represented in media portrayals of poverty

...and that makes welfare unpopular.  Me in The Economist.

Why is America more tolerant of inequality than many rich countries?

For the Economist.

The Rumors [of the Death of Liberalism] Have Been Exaggerated

A review of The Retreat of Western Liberalism by Edward Luce and The Fate of the West: The Battle to Save the World’s Most Successful Political Idea by Bill Emmott, for Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.

The cost of the American dream

Inequality of opportunity is a big deal in America.  For the Economist.

Expanding and Measuring Opportunities

Expanding and Measuring Opportunities is a working paper for the Center for Development and Enterprise.  The idea that circumstances and free choice can be neatly divided is open to considerable debate. The [equality of] opportunity framework begs the question, ‘what is in the control of the individual?’ Regardless, equality of opportunity is about ‘birth luck egalitarianism’-minimizing the variance of birth luck-- while maximizing or expanding opportunity is about efficiently raising the average birth luck. One advantage of ‘opportunity expansion’ over ‘opportunity equalization’ is that an accounting between free will and determinism is unnecessary–there is no concern with estimating the impact of genetic or in utero factors on outcomes, for example. However, if we are worried about maximizing or expanding opportunities rather than equality of opportunities, the approach that is appropriate when defining equal opportunity (the state when measured exogenous factors have no bearings on relative outcomes within a country) does not work. This is because we cannot take the stock (or flow) of outcomes as a given or an irrelevance.  Empirically, allowing the stock of outcomes to vary suggests a goal of expanding or maximizing opportunity may involve a markedly different set of policies than equalizing opportunities. This is because variance in opportunities within countries is far smaller than variance across countries.  That implies a focus on raising national average opportunity may have a far bigger payoff than redistributing opportunities or trying to raise the minimum opportunity to the mean within a country --although greater equality of opportunity is likely to be a method to increase absolute levels of opportunity. 



Unproductive entrepreneurship is increasingly common in America

Baumol in the US --for the Economist.

»